My name is Murv, and I’m a book whore. My last book purchase was…
Okay, kidding aside… Well, sorta… You know me.
Some of you may be aware that all of the RGI books are now available in e-book versions. Not just Kindle, mind you, but the ubiquitous “e-pub” format that is readable on the Sony, Nook, Kobo, and many others. The e-pub versions just hit recently and are available via Smashwords.com – and, they will soon be showing up on many of the popular e-book portals out there, such as Sony’s E-book Store, Barnes & Noble’s Nook Store, and so on.
Well, as usual, I proceeded to tout this on my Facebook page as soon as my publicist, the Amazing Wendy, told me about it. In the midst of all that touting, one of my good buddies, Virginia Witt MD – or “Doc” as I prefer to call her, posed a question to me:
Murv, as an author, how do you feel about e-books? I’m really torn. I love the feel of the book in my hand, and have a reverence for books that goes back years. I can’t dog-ear them, I can’t write in them. It’s like I have the Goddess Libraria as my patroness.
But… my home library has gotten way out of control. The last time I moved (8 years ago) I had 87 boxes of books. Boxes. O. Books. I have multiple bookcases in every room except the bathrooms. And the environment would be helped by fewer trees being killed to make them. But authors are paid less per book sold, yes? So… what’s your take?
Like you, Doc, and many others as well, I am all about the physical book in my hands. But, I think that’s a function of age. We grew up in an era of books on paper and while some of us old farts have made the transition, many of us – like you and I – have not.
That said…
E-books are part of a new avenue in the book industry, just like POD. If you don’t know what that is, POD stands for “Print on Demand.” This basically means that the book is printed on a digital press as opposed to offset, web, sheetfed, etc. That way it can be printed very quickly in smaller batches – when demanded (ordered) and the need for warehousing, extra insurance, inventory taxes, etc are alleviated. Yeah, I may just write the books, but I’ve done a little research.
POD technology was once the purview of not so high quality books put out by not so high quality publishers. Not ALL of them, mind you, but enough of them that the tech got a bad name from it, and bookstores & libraries shunned POD books. Unfortunately, some of them still do today, even though Print on Demand has gone through its trials and tribulations, and has proven itself. In fact, now, almost every publisher on the block – from the big guy to the little guy – is using it for some or all of their titles. It saves money, time, trees, and still accomplishes the same goal. On top of that, there is now a machine – in the second or third generation by this point, I believe – called the Espresso Book Machine. You will find them in some bookstores and libraries. Just a few at the moment, but the number is growing. What this machine does is prints and binds a book for you right on the spot. Yes. What this means is, if the store doesn’t have the book in stock, if it is in the POD system as a digital file, you can have it produced for you right on the spot. Takes all of about 15 minutes. No more waiting for that call from the bookstore – which is sometimes forgotten – to let you know your special order finally showed up. Nope. If the store has an Espresso and the book is available via POD, you order it, go grab a cuppa, and then walk out the door with your freshly printed, still warm hunk o’ literature, and it doesn’t look any different than any other trade paperback on the shelves.
Cool, eh? I sorta think so…
And now, we have e-books…
In reality, e-books have been around almost as long as POD. And again, unfortunately, the tech was the purview of many a fly-by-night publisher that didn’t bother to edit what they were pushing. Still, it was an inexpensive way to get books out into the hands of the people.
And, I’ve always said, everyone has the right to be published. They don’t necessarily have the right to be “read,” however… But you have to have the first part before you can even take a crack at the second part.
Like POD, e-publishing has grown, worn a few hand-me-downs, ripped out its britches a few times, gone shopping, been awkward, had zits, started shaving, and now it has grown up into a young adult…
What I mean by that is this – With the proliferation of the Kindle, then the iPad, now the Sony e-reader (which had been around long before), Nook, Kobo, and others, digital readers are flourishing and coming into their own. More and more people are moving toward e-book versions.
So, my feelings?
- It provides another avenue to get books – mine included – out to a new and ever expanding audience. That means more folks reading (which is good) and a few more jangling coins in my pocket (hopefully) which is good for my daughter’s college fund.
- On the note of getting paid less – well, that’s a yes and no sorta thing. First off, authors don’t get paid anywhere near what people think we get paid, unless, of course, we happen to have a name like Grisham, King, Patterson, “Castle”… I even have an amusing / sad anecdote about that – The o-spring had a school project where she had to write a paper about someone “famous.” It warmed my heart to discover that she chose yours truly as the subject of her research. Unfortunately, a quarter of the way into it I was replaced by someone else because one of her classmates told her I couldn’t possibly be famous because we lived in a modest, suburban house and weren’t “rich.” True story.
- But, on to that money thing… Truth is, the royalty percentage on an e-book is generally higher than on a print book – depending upon your publisher and the contract you have with them. Some authors get ALL of the proceeds as they retained their electronic rights and do it themselves. Of course, the selling price of the e-book is usually lower than that of the print version. So, it all comes out in the wash, really.
- On the note of boxes and boxes of books… I’m right there with you. And, when I am writing while on the road I will often carry a backpack filled with research materials. Ever try to do an OJ through O’Hare when you have 23 minutes between connections and you’re carrying 40 lbs of books and laptop computer on your back? Not fun… So, I’m definitely considering an e-reader of sorts – possibly even an iPad or some other ultra-compact tablet computer – to lighten my load just a bit.
I guess it’s sort of like the car never replacing the horse & buggy… We saw how that worked out. This is not to say that print books will disappear entirely. After all, there are still horses and buggies around. But, I do think they will eventually become a piece of nostalgia, possibly within our lifetimes. Some school / college libraries have already begun replacing hundreds of books from their shelves with electronic versions.
It’s flying, Orville. We’d best grab a seat before they are all taken…
Hope that answered your query Doc. Now I shall go have some more coffee and ponder what sort of e-reader I want to con E K into letting me buy.
More to come…
Murv
Jules
August 22nd, 2010 at 05:14
As both a bookseller and a book lover- I have been somewhat resistant to e-books in my personal life up to this point. I am caving – with a compromise.
I am one of those weird people that, when I am a fan of a series, when a new book is coming out I go back and read the whole series again. The Lucas Davenport books, the Alex Delaware series, RGI, Harry Potter and most of Nora Roberts series’ are on my shelves and have been read and read again. They are dear old friends who just would not be the same in ebook form. That is where the compromise comes in to play.
I am getting ready to buy a Nook (the 3G and Wi-fi version) for myself and one for my parents for Christmas (sshhhhh- don’t tell them!). I will still buy my favorite authors in hard copy and continue to add to those collections, but the books that I am interested in that I would normally wait to hit my local used books store, wait for a friend to finish or might not even buy- I will now buy for my Nook. I am buying one for my folks because of the “share” feature that the Nook offers. With the share feature- if my parents buy a book that I would like to read, I can “borrow” it from their Nook to mine for two weeks- more than enough time for me to read it- and it reverts back to them at the end of that time. No more wondering if I remembered to pack it to go back to their house or worrying about them wanting it when we are longer between visits. They can do the same with the books that I buy.
In the end- we will end up buying more books, I will not have to buy more bookshelves (mine are overstuffed now) and I can still indulge in my collections. Hopefully it will be a win for all of us.
M. R. Sellars
August 22nd, 2010 at 06:21
Jules –
Thanks for that input. Glad to hear you are a fan of the RGI series [ of course 🙂 ] and it’s great to have a bookseller weigh in on this topic. I feel much that same as you regarding which books I would have hardcopy and which electronic. Still, the e-read seems to have become pervasive in society – I can’t count the number of folks who have been asking for the RGI series in Kindle, Nook, Sony, etc versions over the past year. Now that my publisher has made that move, we’ll see how it shakes out. 🙂
I’m still on the fence as to which I will buy. Given the available apps I’m really leaning heavily toward the iPad, as it could be a multipurpose tool for me when I am on the road. Please drop in and give us your feelings on the Nook once you’ve toted it around a while. 😉
Pepper
August 22nd, 2010 at 07:36
As a mad raving bibliophile, I have a real problem with things like the Kindle. (The fact that my Monster-in-law owns one certainly doesn’t help.) I love reading books; the tactile experience is part of the whole, to me, and I am resistant. My inner librarian also cringes, wondering what the hell I’m supposed to do when there are no books to shelve? And yet. As I grow older, and my eyesight begins to deteriorate, I find myself considering the evil benighted Nook, whose print can be magnified on demand…..but I will never own a Kindle. So there!
M. R. Sellars
August 22nd, 2010 at 07:48
ROFL! Well, I hear great things about the Kindle, but don’t lean that way myself either. I too, have the eyesight issues, so magnification is a good thing.
However, I must say that while I, like you, probably won’t go the route of the Kindle, I am more than happy to accept royalties from Kindle sales. I guess that makes me sort of an e-hypocrite. 😉
DS
August 22nd, 2010 at 08:20
I, too, am resistant to the idea of the e-book. There is just something about holding a book as I read it. I love the smell and feel of books! Sometimes, I go to bookstores just to snuffle the books – I know, I’m weird, what can I say?
I do find that reading on the computer gives me a headache if I do so for more than hour or so. On the other hand, being a mac user for the past 10 years, the iPad is pretty slick but it has its drawbacks, too. Like not being able to have more than one window open at a time. For now, I think I will wait to see what Apple turns out next. The idea of having something lighter than my laptop that would allow me to read books in addition to do all of computer-y/internet things is extremely appealing. Plus, my poor husband needs a break from building book shelves!
M. R. Sellars
August 22nd, 2010 at 08:57
I hear you on the limitations – plus I’m NOT a Mac user by any stretch. However, my sister-in-law has one and she loves it. Plus, what I would be doing is replacing my notebook/laptop for travel – and honestly I don’t multi-task (computer-wise) that much when I’m on the road. It would primarily be for checking email, taking a few notes here and there, and my research books as well as maybe a novel or two I’m not dead set on having in HC/PB for my shelves.
Still, since I’m not traveling as much these days, I’m holding off… The prices are going to come down more, and features will be added. I really don’t feel the need for the 3G version, for instance – I just don’t want to be THAT connected, I guess… However, I would like to have the Micro SD slot – but it isn’t available on the Wi-Fi only version…
So for me, like you, it’s still a bit of a waiting game… 🙂
Schueyman
August 22nd, 2010 at 08:24
And you fail to mention the Gutenburg Project, and the eleventy hundred thousand PD books it has now scanned. I just downloaded a bunch of Lovecraft, Wells, Dracula, Frankenstein and others to my iPhone so I could have some things to read while waiting for chemo to be done. And I agree with the general consensus. Love books, always will, but embracing new tech is also a part of my personality. I can’t run games from an e-reader or computer, though, so my game books will always remain HC.
M. R. Sellars
August 22nd, 2010 at 08:51
True. There’s a ton of PD stuff out there… Of course, there was also a big issue with that and Google, as they were not just scanning in the PD books. Authors (or their publishers) literally had to go “opt out” of being scanned and made available for free, even though their works were obviously NOT in the public domain
Makes you wonder why we have that little © symbol in the first place if people/corps are allowed to ignore it UNLESS you jump through extra hoops telling them not to. :-/
chaoticpix93
August 22nd, 2010 at 08:52
I remember when e-books were first starting out. They were in PDF format and you could read them on your computer. I resisted it because looking at a backlit monitor hurt my eyes. Most of them were godawful and they used a white curier font on a black background. (And some were on geocities backgrounds… I’m glad it died a slow painful death!)
I too, am a bibliophile with my family balking at the fact that for my birthday I requested two bookshelves. (In all fairness, i’m using the second one as a display shelf for some of my posessions I love.) But it’s a necessity with all the reading I do. I don’t own a TV, and I catch up on shows on hulu.com while I”m doing other chores.
My friend just bought a kindle. She loves it. I was glad to find out that it’s not backlit like the pictures look. I’m also considering getting one, or shopping around for different readers. It’s just that I lose everything. I lost an ipod recently and when I lose a book, it’s just one book, and in all likeliness not 100$ to replace.
Schueyman
August 22nd, 2010 at 08:58
DS- I was at a convention recently where they held a panel on new tech, featuring the iPad. The general consensus of the panel was that while it is a great tool, it is really in beta testing. All manufacturers are pretty much releasing their gizmos before they are completely done. Thus allowing the wider consumer market to find all the bugs. Sadly, this seems to be true for Apple as well. I think it is wise to wait for iPad 2.
DS
August 22nd, 2010 at 09:18
Murv & Schueyman – Yep, that pretty much sums it up for me. I love my Mac Powerbook and would be lost without it, but I am extremely reluctant to fork over the cash for the iPad after reading all of the reviews. (We also have a desktop that we do all our editing with FCP on and it just doesn’t get any better than that!) I rather resent Apple using their customers as guinea pigs for their new products. Used to be, if you bought an Apple product, the only surprises you got were good ones – like it did things even quicker and easier than you thought it would. That said, the iPad IS impressive, though.
And I DO do a lot of multi-tasking on my laptop both at home and when I travel, so the multi window thing is a huge deal for me. I frequently have no less than three windows open at a time. I will certainly be waiting to see what the next version they put it out is like.
Thanks for the feedback. 🙂 And Murv, good blog!
M. R. Sellars
August 22nd, 2010 at 09:25
We’ll have to give Doc some of the credit… I wasn’t sure what I was going to write about for today’s installment – until she asked that question, that is… 😉
Tessa
August 22nd, 2010 at 09:31
I am so glad to hear you are okay and still make money with E books. I had to stop buying books…..well as many anyway, and was forced to sell or give away many many of the thousands (yes you read that right) of books I owned. I love books,, and as my hubby says prefer to cuddle up with a book then with him. I love the way they look, smell and feel…….so my environmentalist minded self and my bookworm self have been in constant battle for many years………finally last year we made a big move to another state and I realized that I was going to have to rent a climate controlled storage room and leave my books alone in the dark….I just could not do that,so I started sharing them…..now I am down to just under 300 books that I could not live without (yes yours are in that group) and I’ve started utilizing the library to get my fix. I have considered buying a Kindle, and borrowed one to give it a try, it is compact, easy to use, not very heavy, and lighted, all great things and will be great for traveling and when I have to stand in line, but I will always go back to real books in the end for my comfort and reading in the home…..nothing does it for me like gently holding a book and turning the pages as I take the much needed trip out of reality into the worlds created by great writers.
M. R. Sellars
August 22nd, 2010 at 09:38
Glad to be counted among the “must haves” 🙂
As I understand it, the Nook has the touchscreen so it gives you a simulation of turning the page. Not saying it is a replacement for the real thing, but might be better than the Kindle… (shrug)
Dee
August 22nd, 2010 at 09:36
I’m a die hard physical paper book fan, I just can’t get the hang of the new technology.
I am wondering, however, if you know of any bookstores in the St. Louis area, especially the metro east, that have the Espresso technology. I often hunt for obscure books, and that print on demand feature would be my absolute dream.
M. R. Sellars
August 22nd, 2010 at 09:44
Here’s a list of locations:
http://www.ondemandbooks.com/our_ebm_locations.htm
Unfortunately, it looks like the closest would be the UM Columbia Bookstore. I’m not sure when this was last updated, to be honest. I thought I had read recently that there were more EBM’s out there than they have listed. Still, even this list is a damn sight better than the 2 or 3 that were out there a few years ago. It’s growing, and as the price on the tech comes down it will become more prevalent.
The only rub will be *if* a given work is available via POD. Tons are, but some still aren’t. I suspect that will be changing drastically in the not too distant future…
Dee
August 22nd, 2010 at 09:38
Also, I will preview pages from comics or chapters from books online, if available, but I always go out and buy a physical copy to hold in my hands. It’s easier to open a book than to power my laptop and find the files.
Dee
August 22nd, 2010 at 09:51
Thanks. I did a little research in the last few minutes, and it looks like they can use pdf files. They even do out of print works. If only my local Borders would get one!
Thanks for the info. I’ll definitely be on the lookout as the tech becomes more widespread.
Gina
August 22nd, 2010 at 09:54
I’m pretty much resigned to the fact that I will need to debride this damn library when next I move. Probably going to sell most of them (95% of my library is SF/Fantasy) on Ebay or something. Just can’t see packing them all up and shlepping them yet again, and I’m getting a hankerin’ to downsize. Keep us informed as to what your choice is and how it works out, Murv, because I know it’s coming for me as well. Should make all my favorite authors happy because I’ll be re-buying books for whatever e-format I finally get.
And who you callin’ an old fart, big guy? o_O
M. R. Sellars
August 22nd, 2010 at 10:00
ROFL! Okay, the cheese stands alone, I guess…
😉
John M
August 22nd, 2010 at 10:16
I’ve read Pepper’s comment and your response to it several times, Murv, and I can’t quite figure out WHY Pepper strongly, and you not so strongly, dislike the Kindle reader. The only tangible thing the two of you mentioned was magnification, which the Kindle does do.
So is it philosophical opposition to the mega-bookstore Amazon? If not, it would appear to be something visceral, the way other splinter groups oppose Crocs, Comic Sans, and gay marriage. To date, none of the groups opposing any of those realities can give a coherent reason why, either.
That said, I have a Kindle, I really, really like it, and it has led to my buying books that I would not have thought to buy by driving to a bookstore or by ordering online and waiting a week for arrival. The reading experience is still quite enjoyable, and I can carry (at current count) 25 books and several newspapers and magazines around with me in one hand. Now, please excuse me — the Sunday paper just arrived.
M. R. Sellars
August 22nd, 2010 at 10:42
John –
True. Very true. I think in my case – I can’t speak for Pepper, obviously – it is born of a couple of bad experiences with Amazon – those being where they screwed me out of money and then basically said, “Too bad, peon, just what do you think you can do about it?” (obviously not in those exact words, but that was the gist of the conversation.)
That said, my opposition really isn’t to the Kindle, but as you said, the mega-bookstore itself. I’ve seen Kindles, held them in hand, played around with them, and actually do *like* the product. I just don’t want to give Bezos any more of my money.
Of course, my books are listed on Amazon – that’s something that happens with books in general. They are, after all, the worlds largest online bookstore… And, in that I suppose I’m a bit of a hypocrite because I do *want* them available through that channel, as it is a dominant force in the marketplace and a “necessary evil” if you want a book to succeed in today’s world. I just tend to avoid giving money to folks/companies who have cheated me in the past and been unwilling to even entertain the fact that they might have been in error.
And, in all fairness, while it might seem as though I advocate the Nook, I don’t really. I was simply pointing out the touchscreen thing – The Kindle I played with didn’t have that. Not sure if they have it on the newer generations, and if they do, then the point was moot. Truth is, Barnes and Noble hosed me too, and in a much worse fashion than Amazon, so I haven’t bought anything from them in years… But again, my books are available through them, they pay the wholesaler, the wholesaler pays my publisher, and eventually I end up with my two bits, just like with Amazon and everyone else.
So, the reality is that if I were to go with an e-reader alone and not an iPad sort of thing, I’d probably end up with a Sony or a Kobo. But that’s just idle speculation at this point…
I’m also willing to admit that my experience may well NOT be the norm for Amazon and/or B&N – but they still left a bad taste in my mouth, so to speak.
And, while I agree that my feelings about them could be construed as somewhat irrational, we aren’t necessarily rational beings. LOL!
Hope that all makes some sort of bizarre sense…
Tessa
August 22nd, 2010 at 10:23
Thanks for the info, will look into the nook, also looking at the Ipad, but am leery of first generation products and want to give it a few years to work out bugs.
John M
August 22nd, 2010 at 10:59
Re: Dee’s comment at 9:36 am
Did anyone other than myself find it amusing that the remark “I just can’t get the hang of the new technology” was written in a comment posted to an online blog?
M. R. Sellars
August 22nd, 2010 at 11:10
ROFL!
BobbiK
August 22nd, 2010 at 11:02
I have the Nook and really like it. As Murv said, it has a small touch screen on the bottom that you can use to turn pages with a swipe as opposed to clicking the buttons. I can’t believe how addicted to reading on it I’ve become.
The reason I ultimately got an eReader though was because I have a small child that likes to sit with me when I read but has a strong desire to destroy paper books. With my Nook, I can read one-handed and not worry about torn pages. I’ve read more in the month I’ve had my nook than I had the rest of this year. Also, with the leather cover I bought for it, it feels like a real book in my hands. (Really wanting an Oberon cover for it, but they’re a bit too pricey even if they are gorgeous!)
I chose the Nook over the Kindle because of the touch screen and the fact that I can borrow ebooks from my library on it.
As for the iPad, I wouldn’t buy one for reading on regularly. The LCD screen can hurt your eyes when reading for an extended time. I used to try to read ebooks on my netbook using a program to rotate the screen, but it gave me headaches and eye strain. The e-Ink screens on most stand-alone readers aren’t backlit, so they don’t cause these issues.
All-in-all, I’m glad that the RGI series is finally available in an ebook format as I’ve been trying to read the series recently and the paperbacks weren’t going to last, lol!
kat
August 22nd, 2010 at 21:07
omgs! soon there will be no hard copy books, and it will be farenheit 451 from kinndel!
Celeste
August 23rd, 2010 at 07:22
My first view of an e-book was a Nook, and I havent seen the others yet. The salesman was good, new his product and its advantage over the Kindle. All public domain books (classics) are free on this service. I beleive he said if I bought a book on Nook I could share it with my family- I could transfer it to my son’s laptop, for instance, without having to pay extra. I liked how it looked like a real page and how it felt in my hands. As the daughter of a packrat desparately trying to purge so that she can have space, the books I bought and havent opened since I first read them are leaving. E-book would be an opportunity to have my space and keep my books- especially as I purged books I thought my children would never read and then they came home and asked for them (rolleyes). I like the feel of a book and I dont buy books or anything else online I cant touch frsti. I like the idea of reading a book in the library and then deciding I want to own it and being able to have it in that tiny virtual library of my own. I wish that the publishing industry had started with textbooks- my high school and college student would be spared many chiropractors visits and miss far less assignments if their texts were all in one pocket size location(that they couldnt forget to bring to school, or home from school)! I collect books from the late 1800’s and early 1900’s because I like the way books were made then. They are my antiques.
I would like to see the other e-book options now that Iknow there are more than Nook and Kindle.
M. R. Sellars
August 23rd, 2010 at 08:30
Take a run over to the electronics department at Tar-jay [ should be easy enough 😉 ]. They carry – or did last time I was there – the Sony e-reader. You can at least check that one out hands on… I think they sell the Kobo at Mal-Wart…
Tasialue
August 23rd, 2010 at 10:05
I’ve owned a nook for a little over a month now. I like it, but there are a few hiccups that the technology has to work out. Had I been able to afford it, I would have gone with an iPad. Here’s why:
1. The browser feature on the nook is a real pain to work with. It takes forever for it to refresh the page as you scroll, and typing into fields is like pulling teeth. The interface is great for reading books, but NOT for web use.
2. I’d love to be able to have a few more applications (email, browser, notebook) I can use when ideas hit me. The nook doesn’t have a notebook feature, and the browser, as I said, is frustrating to use.
3. PDF docs (not all, though) and E-PUB books are the only formats the nook supports. I can convert a lot of things to PDF, but some books are only coming out in Kindle format. VERY frustrating. I did not like having to wait for the RGI series, and there are a lot of titles I fear have “exclusive” deals with Amazon.
That said, here’s why I did go with the nook:
1. Non-backlit screen. Sure, you have to have an external light source (or a clip-on thingie), but it’s sooooooo much easier on the eyes to read!
2. The touchscreen panel at the bottom. While it’s a bear to deal with in the browser mode, it’s very handy elsewhere. My iPod touch has spoiled me on touchscreens, so I occasionally forget and touch the e-ink part, but it’s really very easy to use.
3. Expandable memory. I can pop off the back and add miniSD cards. Pretty much makes it impossible to run out of space for books.
4. Free Fridays. Every Friday, B&N offers a free book. I’ve found a few pleasant reads by authors I never would have tried if not for this feature.
5. The Daily. B&N has a little daily magazine kind of thing, with humor, trivia, and upcoming release articles. Great for coupling with a good cuppa.
A few aggravations about the nook itself:
1. The “lending library” feature. It’s not for every book you download to your nook. In fact, it’s for only a small percentage at this point. An author/publisher has to agree to allow the lending part, I believe, before you can let someone “borrow” it from you.
2. E-PUB books downloaded from a site other than B&N must be stored in “My Documents”, not in the main E-PUB library. I’d rather have E-PUB books in one folder and PDF files in another. Perhaps future updates will allow for this.
There’s my two cents. Now I’m off to find more Sudafed. *sniff*
Schueyman
August 23rd, 2010 at 17:07
My sister has a Nook and likes it pretty well. I’d love to have an iPad, of course, but aside from not wanting to be a beta tester, there’s no way in hell I can afford one. And of course, as I say, I’m not sure I’ll ever be able to get the hang of not reading REAL books.
Amber
September 5th, 2010 at 21:06
I am a huge fan of EBooks. I am blind and it’s much easier for me to carry around EBooks on my Braille PDA than it is to carry around bulky Braille books. I can literally carry around an entire library on one small SD card. It’s really revolutionized what people with print disabilities can read compared with just a few years ago.
Amber
M. R. Sellars
September 5th, 2010 at 21:27
Very cool. I didn’t even know there was such a thing as a Braille PDA. That’s fantastic! 🙂
Amber
September 5th, 2010 at 22:11
I will say though that it is a lot of work preparing books in electronic format. Unfortunately, the Nook, Kindle, etc, are not accessible to the blind so we duplicate a lot of work, including scanning the book and proof-reading it for errors. The IPhone/IPad has potential for us in the EBook market, and sites like http://www.bookshare.org for Americans is really helpful, too. Sorry to ramble on so… I’m in the process of turning all of your books into books I can read… Two down, a few more to go!! 🙂 I’m hugely passionate about making books accessible for those with print disabilities, hence the ramble.
M. R. Sellars
September 6th, 2010 at 03:36
Interesting… Is there a particular format that works best?
Amber
September 6th, 2010 at 10:20
It’s really hard to answer that question for a variety of reasons. Most of the formats: RTF, TXT, and unsecured PDF, authors bawk at because they are not secure. I gather a lot of the reason so many authors/publishers love encripted formats is because they can not be as easily pirated and I totally understand that, but at the same time publishers have crossed out a portion of the population that in studies have been found to read a lot more than the average person.
For example, the blindness community has been battling with Amazon.com for years regarding their kindle and the inaccessibility of it. Amazon claims they are working on the accessibility of it but don’t let them fool you. 🙂
M. R. Sellars
September 6th, 2010 at 10:29
Okay… Wasn’t sure what worked best… So, if the Rich Text format were available via an ebook distributor such as Smashwords, then that would make life easier on you and other blind and/or sight impaired folks? I certainly can’t make any guarantees, but I can talk to my editor and strongly suggest…
Amber
September 6th, 2010 at 10:34
I actually haven’t checked out Smashwords yet. I will do that, but I really need the coffee to kick in, first. Some formats I can play around with and make work, but RTF does make things much less complicated.
Have a nice Labor day, if you’re taking it off!
I might scan your third book today in celebration. I moved six months ago cross-country and your books made the cut to come with me… But they still might be in a box!
M. R. Sellars
September 6th, 2010 at 11:11
Good deal! I’m glad I made it. 🙂
Right now I think smashwords has the E-Pub, mobi, and pdb formats. They can be made available as RTF’s, but my publisher hasn’t done that for the very reasons you stated earlier. My books are already being pirated as PDF’s on numerous torrents, and unfortunately people just don’t understand that I’m not wealthy by any stretch, and that they are basically stealing right out of my pocket every time they download a “free” copy…
If you check out smashwords, let me know. I’ll be happy to talk to my editor. Like I said, I can’t make any guarantees, but I can certainly go to bat for you. 😉
Amber
September 6th, 2010 at 20:39
I found out that the EPub format can be read on my IPod touch. I’ve devoured the book shamelessly and am almost done. If I’m not done with the book tomorrow, and return late from my lunch break, can you write me an excuse note? 🙂
Smashwords works well for me as of now. Another site for instant book gratification. I’m in trouble now.
M. R. Sellars
September 6th, 2010 at 20:42
Rock on, glad it worked out for you! And sure, I’ll write you a note. LOL!